Gas drillers, Idaho counties reach agreement
by The Associated Press
Published: January 30,2012
Time posted: 9:41 am
A group representing Idaho counties and a group representing companies interested in tapping natural gas in the state announced an agreement Jan. 29 on legislation they plan to introduce into the Idaho Legislature next month.
The Idaho Association of Counties and the Idaho Petroleum Council said the guidelines will allow counties some control over natural gas development, while natural gas wildcatters will have a clearer path to tapping fields.
But a conservation group said the agreement appears to reduce local control over industries by allowing state lawmakers to create rules that counties and cities wouldn’t be able to exceed with their own ordinances.
The proposed legislation was not released, but a news release said the legislation would allow local governments to create regulations involving exploration and processing as long as the rules didn’t prevent companies from building infrastructure.
The groups also said the proposed legislation would let local governments pass their own ordinances regulating the industry as long as those ordinances don’t conflict with state law.
“Local siting and operational issues are important to our members and to the people of Idaho,” Dan Chadwick, executive director of the Idaho Association of Counties, said in a statement. “This consensus legislation promises counties and their residents that their unique insight will be an important part of our state’s growing natural gas industry.”
“This agreement is an example of what happens when reasonable people have a chance to sit down and forge compromise,” said Suzanne Budge, executive director of the Idaho Petroleum Council.
Idaho officials have been scrambling to develop new rules after natural gas discoveries in 2010 in an ancient lake bed a mile beneath the surface of Payette County, to Washington County’s south.
Natural gas wildcatters have been concerned about cities and counties passing laws that could halt development of Idaho’s emerging oil and natural gas fields. A main concern is hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, that some fear could harm the region’s groundwater.
“It strikes me from this press release that the counties can’t veto anything,” Justin Hayes of the Idaho Conservation League told The Associated Press Jan. 29. “Which leads me to believe that the oil and gas industry can get whatever they want, and the counties will just have to take it. Setting all the rhetoric aside, it still sounds like, in the end, counties cannot object to proposals that they don’t like.”
Snake River Oil & Gas, which is exploring for gas in western Idaho, helped develop the legislation after Washington County proposed an ordinance with strict size limits, expensive bonds, multi-million-dollar insurance policies and restrictions on well locations, among other things.
“We are committed to Idaho, and want to make sure the public officials and citizens they represent are completely comfortable with our industry and our work,” said Richard Brown, owner of Snake River Oil & Gas, in the statement released Jan. 29. “This agreement provides assurances for citizens and certainty for businesses, and is a model for other states to follow.”
Industry officials said last year they were working on the legislation with the Idaho Petroleum Council. An early draft of that legislation said that “an ordinance, rule, resolution, requirement or standard of a city, county or other political subdivision of this state shall not prohibit, either actually or operationally, and shall not frustrate the siting, construction or operation of facilities” with state approval.
Hayes said it was unclear to him why the Idaho Association of Counties would back legislation that appeared to limit the power of counties in favor of state control. But he said the backing of the association could sway some state lawmakers toward approving the legislation.
“Clearly, a compromise like this makes an easy way out for legislators who had been conflicted,” he said.

![[Print]](http://idahobusinessreview.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://idahobusinessreview.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://idahobusinessreview.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[del.icio.us]](http://idahobusinessreview.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/delicious.png)
![[Facebook]](http://idahobusinessreview.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://idahobusinessreview.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/twitter.png)


January 30th, 2012 at 1:37 pm
Hayes is right, Idaho counties can’t do anything, neither can towns or cities, because of the immutable fact Idaho’s imperial legislature refuses to grant constitutional home-rule powers to those lower level governments. Only state in the American West.
Any statute contrived to grant municipalities or counties regulatory powers can be defeated in higher level courts (state & federal), especially if the natgas reserves & pricing makes it worthwhile. All this “hub-bub” is std Idaho cosmetics that somehow, good intentions will prevail. It may mean that Idaho will be forced by the EPA, after all these bogus statutory municipal remedies are defeated, to create a huge state bureaucracy.
Or else, give the towns, cities, and counties of Idaho constitutional home-rule powers.