Quantcast

Friday May 24, 2013 4:27 am  

Intoxilyzer certificates admissible without testimony, rules Idaho Court of Appeal (access required)

by Pat Murphy

Published: May 4,2012

A drunk driving defendant’s Confrontation Clause rights were not violated by the admission of Intoxilyzer 5000 certificates without the testimony of the technician who prepared them, the Idaho Court of Appeals has ruled in affirming a conviction. The defendant was convicted of driving under the influence based on the results of a breath test administered by ...
[Print] [Email] [RSS Feed] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [linkedin] [Twitter]



Subscribers get free access to our whitepaper library. Recent topics include:

  • Temporary Solution: An employer's guide to contingent workers
  • Big Ideas for Small Business: Social media marketing strategies

Try us for 30 days and see!

Already a subscriber? Claim your Whitepapers here.

Comments are closed.

RSS Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

MARKETPLACE

Lessons from the Tamarack Resort foreclosure

By Wyatt B. Johnson

When the Titanic hit an iceberg, it only had enough lifeboats for one-third of its passengers. Tamarack Resort’s creditors have a similar problem; there are not enough lifeboats. The “lifeboat” for a troubled loan is collateral. It is the most likely repayment source. A lender can foreclose and sell collateral when a borrower cannot pay [...]

COUNTERPOINT

The benefits of immigration reform outweigh the costs

By Peter R. Crabb

Bipartisan support for immigration reform has been growing in Congress, and legislation has been introduced that will go a long way to bettering the lives of many immigrants and rationalizing U.S. labor market policies. In spite of a wide range of support, this important effort now faces a stumbling block. Idaho Republican Rep. Raul Labrador [...]